Utah State
                  University   INDEX   DIRECTORIES   CALENDAR   LIBRARIES   QUAD   WEBMAIL   WEBCAM   GIVING TO UTAH STATE    
    

home > Assessment > Assessment Plan
Department of Physics

  Assessment Plan

 

The Physics program assesses its Learning Outcomes at a programmatic level as follows.

  • Exit interviews of all seniors by Department Head and Dean's office. The department head interviews each graduating senior with the goal of gleaning what worked and what didn't work in the physics program, principally from the student's perspective, of course.  The interview is based upon a questionnaire that the student reviews/completes prior to the interview. The questionnaire inquires about the goals the student has for his/her physics degree, the various strengths and weaknesses of the physics program relative to supporting these goals, and the student's self-assessment of the degree to which the Physics Department Learning Outcomes have been implemented.  A copy of the interview questionnaire can be found here.  The Dean's office conducts its own exit interviews of graduating seniors.  We focus on 16 of the questions which are relevant to our undergraduate program.  The students provide feedback regarding the USU Physics program in the areas of: curriculum, course quality, laboratory quality, infrastructure, advising and overall satisfaction.

  • Compilation and analysis of student course evaluations.

  • Feedback from students, teachers, and other stakeholders.  A variety of formal and informal interactions with students and faculty feature in this most traditional of assessment schemes. These interactions include faculty meetings, faculty retreats, interaction with out physics student advisor, regular faculty-graduate student meetings, etc. A good number of improvements in our program have arisen through this mechanism.
  • Evaluation of Learning Outcomes via our Capstone Project.  The Physics Capstone Project is a formal course, Physics 4900, Research in Physics, required of all physics majors.  A student teams up with a faculty mentor to execute a suitable research project.  Some student-faculty teams spend several semesters on their joint research and the research often results in a publication.  Besides working closely with a faculty mentor for an extended period of time, students are required to give a written account of their research and give a presentation of their work in a public venue. This is more than a senior project it is a scaled down version of the kind of work that goes into an MS thesis, PhD dissertation, or "real world" post-graduate applications.  From the assessment point of view, faculty are able to determine whether the course of study in the physics major adequately prepares the student for the kind of work expected of an undergraduate physics graduate.  Faculty members assess the students based upon the Physics Learning Outcomes, using a 4 point scale and use this rubric to determine the student's grade. The mentor's evaluation of learning outcomes is submitted to the Physics 4900 director for program assessment purposes.  This method of assessment is new since it uses the learning outcomes which came out of the recently completed state of Utah physics tuning process.   Since this course assesses what a student can do in a professional-level application at the end of their formal coursework, and since the assessment takes place via extensive one on one interactions with an expert, this method of assessment promises to be the principal tool in the assessment toolbox for the physics department.  Physics 4900 structure and assessment rubric.